Key Takeaways Saylor opposed the BIP-110 fork, warning that changing consensus to stop spam sets a dangerous precedent. Adam Back criticized BIP-110, stating the anti-spam rules conflict with free, permissionless money. Purists support the fork to block non-monetary data, while critics predict a minor long-term impact. Michael Saylor Labels BIP-110 As ‘Dangerous’ As the activation of Bitcoin Improvement Proposal-110 (BIP-110), a so-called anti-spam fork for Bitcoin, looms, industry figures are increasingly taking critical positions about the effect that it might have on the wider Bitcoin ecosystem. Michael Saylor, executive chairman and co-founder of Strategy, the largest corporate holder of BTC, …
Bitcoin
Crypto
Strategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor has renewed speculation about the company’s next Bitcoin transaction. In a July 12 post, he shared Strategy’s familiar acquisition chart …
Ethereum has continued its recovery from the June lows and is now approaching a major technical inflection point. While the recent rally has improved short-term …
