MIT says that because of issues in regards to the “integrity” of a high-profile paper in regards to the results of synthetic intelligence on analysis and innovation, the paper needs to be “withdrawn from public discourse.”
The paper in query, “Synthetic Intelligence, Scientific Discovery, and Product Innovation,” was written by a doctoral scholar within the college’s economics program. It claimed to indicate that the introduction of an AI device right into a large-but-unidentified supplies science lab led to the invention of extra supplies and extra patent filings, however at the price of decreasing researchers’ satisfaction with their work.
MIT economists Daron Acemoglu (who not too long ago won the Nobel Prize) and David Autor each praised the paper final yr, with Autor telling the Wall Street Journal he was “floored.” In an announcement included in MIT’s announcement on Friday, Acemoglu and Autor described the paper as “already identified and mentioned extensively within the literature on AI and science, though it has not been revealed in any refereed journal.”
Nevertheless, the 2 economists stated they now have “no confidence within the provenance, reliability or validity of the info and within the veracity of the analysis.”
According to the WSJ, a pc scientist with expertise in supplies science approached Acemoglu and Autor with issues in January. They introduced these issues to MIT, resulting in an inside overview.
MIT says that because of scholar privateness legal guidelines, it can’t disclose the outcomes of that overview, however the paper’s writer is “now not at MIT.” And whereas the college’s announcement doesn’t title the writer, each a preprint version of the paper and the preliminary press protection establish him as Aidan Toner-Rodgers. (TechCrunch has reached out to Toner-Rodgers for remark.)
MIT additionally says it has requested the paper be withdrawn from The Quarterly Journal of Economics, the place it was submitted for publication, and from the preprint web site arXiv. Apparently, solely a paper’s authors are purported to submit arXiv withdrawal requests, however MIT says “thus far, the writer has not executed so.”
