Leaks are a fixed a part of massive product information cycles, notably for corporations like Apple. On-line soothsayers like Jon Prosser and Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman have lengthy predicted the content material of upcoming Apple bulletins, citing nameless sources from inside the firm to glean glimpses of what’s subsequent. They’ve been appropriate typically sufficient to grow to be an actual ache for the Cupertino firm.
Now, Apple has seized upon a possibility to battle again towards leaks. In a grievance filed Thursday in US federal court docket for the Northern District of California, Apple is accusing distinguished leaker Jon Prosser of allegedly scheming to “break into an Apple improvement iPhone, steal Apple’s commerce secrets and techniques, and revenue from the theft.”
The go well with alleges that, together with a co-conspirator, Prosser, who makes movies on the YouTube channel Front Page Tech, intentionally took benefit of an Apple worker named Ethan Lipnik who had entry to a developer iPhone working the as-of-yet unreleased software program that will grow to be iOS 26. The go well with alleges that the opposite defendant, Michael Ramacciotti, who was staying at Lipnik’s house on the time, waited for Lipnik to depart earlier than accessing the event telephone and exhibiting particulars of the unreleased software program to Prosser over a video name. Prosser then allegedly used data obtained in that early peek at iOS in movies that he posted on his YouTube channel effectively earlier than Apple formally introduced the updates.
The go well with additionally alleges that Ramacciotti claims Prosser masterminded the entire plan, promising Ramacciotti he would “discover out a means for [Mr. Ramacciotti] to get fee.”
Prosser has denied any wrongdoing and says the small print of the go well with are incorrect. In public posts on X, Prosser has maintained that this was not how issues went down on his finish.
“The main points that Apple was given are simply not correct,” Prosser wrote to me through a direct message on X. “I had no information of how the information was obtained. He by no means advised me he ‘wanted cash’ and I completely didn’t instruct him to behave this out.”
Prosser doesn’t deny that he did reveal the knowledge gleaned from Ramacciotti. He highlighted the small print concerning the unreleased replace in a sequence of movies earlier this yr, together with one in which he referred to as the information, “the most important iOS leak ever.”
Regardless of the query of how he truly acquired the knowledge, the aftermath has been messy. Ethan Lipnik, the Apple worker who had the event telephone that Ramacciotti is alleged to have accessed, was fired by the corporate. Based on the grievance, Apple ended Lipnik’s employment “for failing to observe Apple’s insurance policies designed to guard its confidential data, together with improvement units and unreleased software program and options.”
Apple has not responded to requests for remark. Ethan Lipnik has additionally not responded to a request for remark.
“It is fairly a big lawsuit,” says Anshel Sag, principal analyst on the tech analysis agency Moor Insights & Technique, in an e-mail. “However I additionally imagine that there’s fairly a disparity between what Prosser is saying and what Apple alleges, particularly for the reason that worker appeared to not concentrate on what was happening.”
The most important drawback being alleged right here, Sag says, is that whereas the information was taken from a improvement gadget that ought to have been higher protected, how that information was acquired and the place it got here from ought to have been vetted earlier than the small print have been put out into the world.
“Finally, each firm fights leaks, particularly Apple, however with this occurring fully within the US the corporate has much more energy and legal guidelines to assist its efforts,” Sag says. Many Apple leaks have historically come from sources exterior the US, equivalent to from inside its manufacturing and provide chain companions in Asia. As a result of the grievance focuses on occasions that allegedly happened in California, Apple can argue in federal court docket that two US legal guidelines—the Defend Commerce Secrets and techniques Act and the Laptop Fraud And Abuse Act—have been violated.
Prosser says he didn’t even discover out concerning the lawsuit till studying a MacRumors story concerning the submitting.
“I really feel terrible that Ethan was terminated over this,” Prosser says. “I want he had shared with Apple what had occurred, and I want that Apple would have related with me for extra solutions—I’d have gladly chatted with them.”
